Login with Netlify Identity

Principal Recipient Audit Approach

Audits of UNDP are guided by the so-called ‘single audit’ principle, whereby any review of UNDP activities by an external authority, including any governmental authority, is precluded, instead a) the United Nations Board of Auditors (UN BoA) retains the exclusive right to carry out external audit of the accounts, book and statements of UNDP; and b) the Office of Audit and Investigations (OAI) retains the exclusive right to carry out internal audit of the accounts, books and statements of UNDP.

The purpose of the ‘single audit’ principle is to avoid that UNDP operations, transactions and books are audited more than once by more than one party. To this effect, the UN BoA and OAI coordinate their audit activities to avoid any possible duplication of efforts and no other entity, external or internal, has the authority to audit UNDP activities.

  1. The Framework Agreement (FA) between UNDP and the Global Fund was amended in September 2023. Art. 2(a) of the UNDP-Global Fund Grant Regulations attached to the amended Framework Agreement recognizes that UNDP “will implement or oversee the implementation of the Program in accordance with UNDP regulations, rules, policies and procedures and decisions of the UNDP Governing Bodies, as well as the terms and conditions of the relevant Grant Agreement”. In line with the ‘single audit’ principle and the Global Fund grants entrusted to UNDP as Implementing Agent (IA) shall only be audited by either the UN BoA or the UNDP OAI. Under no circumstances should the Global Fund’s policies govern, or in any way apply to internal audits of grant implementation. Please refer to the legal framework section of the Manual. As stated in Article 4.3 of the Framework Agreement, the consultation and coordination on audits and investigations between the Global Fund and UNDP are separately agreed through working arrangements between the independent oversight offices of the two organizations. UNDP Financial Regulations and Rules apply to these grants.

  2. The Framework Agreement further provides guidance on the working arrangements between UNDP and the Global Fund in this area, including Article 4.2 of the Framework Agreement which details that “Without prejudice to Articles 14 and 15 of the UNDP-Global Fund Grant Regulations, the Global Fund may directly conduct any reviews of suppliers and of Sub-recipients which are not part of the United Nations System. The scope of such reviews is linked to the Global Fund verifying compliance with the terms of the relevant Grant Agreement”. These reviews typically result in OIG reports.

  3. Art. 4.3 of the Framework Agreement details the arrangements between the oversight offices of each entities: “-….consultation and coordination on audits and investigations are separately agreed through working arrangements between the independent oversight offices of UNDP and the Global Fund and Section 30.7 of the UNDP-Global Fund Grant Regulations and reflect the Global Fund’s right to conduct audits and investigations of suppliers and of Sub-recipients which are not part of the United Nations System. UNDP’s Office of Audit and Investigations (OAI) will work closely with the Global Fund’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) to ensure that there is a proportionate and robust response to allegations of wrongdoing across Global Fund grants administered by the UNDP….”

  4. Furthermore, in practice, Global Fund grants are subject to particularly intense oversight and audit, given the challenging environments in which UNDP manages these grants and the fact that they are more risk-prone than many other UNDP projects. To that end, OAI has resources dedicated solely to the audit and investigations of Global Fund programmes.

  5. The ‘single audit’ principle is also expressly confirmed in Art. 7(b) of the Grant Regulations, which states as follows: “The Program Books and Records of the Principal Recipient shall be subject exclusively to internal and external audit in accordance with its financial regulations, rules and policies and procedures.” While under this provision OAI audits Global Fund grants in accordance with its standard procedures, to provide assurance to the UNDP Administrator that UNDP has, among other things, accepted the following commitments:

    • Provide to the Global Fund a copy of its externally audited financial statements covering each year in which Grant funds are expended, together with the opinion of its external auditors on such statements, no later than thirty (30) days after such audited financial statements and opinion are published (Article 7b(iv) of the Grant Regulations);
    • No later than 30 June of each year, submit to the Global Fund a financial statement certified by the UNDP Chief Financial Officer for the preceding year (Article 7c of the Grant Regulations); and
    • Keep programme books and records in accordance with its rules (which as of 2016 provide for retention for seven years after the document date), or for such longer period, if any, as may be requested by the Global fund in writing to the Headquarters of the Principal Recipient (PR) in order to resolve any claims.

In addition, in countries falling under the Global Fund’s Additional Safeguards Policy (ASP)[1], the Global Fund may request a special purpose audit on the use of Global Fund resources. In such cases, UNDP must (1) secure the appointment of a mutually agreed independent auditor; and (2) prepare mutually agreed audit terms of reference which reflect, as necessary, circumstances giving rise to the Global Fund’s request for said audit. The cost of such special purpose audit are charged to the grant budget. The Global Fund’s request for a special purpose audit is handled in conformity with the working arrangements agreed between the independent oversight offices of the PR and the Global Fund (See Article 7b(ii) of the Grant Regulations).

Each year, guided by a risk-based audit approach, OAI determines the list of UNDP Country Offices (COs) that are serving as Global Fund interim PR, which will be audited in the following year. The list is submitted to the UNDP Administrator for approval and shared with the Global Fund Secretariat and the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the Global Fund.

In accordance with UNDP Executive Board Decision 2012/18, as of 1 December 2012, UNDP publishes on its audit public disclosure website all UNDP audit reports within 30 calendar days after they are internally issued to UNDP management.

Practice Pointer

The Project Management Unit (PMU) should appoint an audit focal point to cover both the CO and Sub-recipient (SR) audits. It is important that the focal point is granted access to Comprehensive Audit and Recommendation Database System (CARDS) system.

[1] The Additional Safeguard Policy (ASP) is a risk management tool applied on the basis of risks identified in countries where a grant or group of grants is/are being implemented. The ASP comes into effect when the systems to ensure accountability over the use of Global Fund resources are notably weak and assets would be exposed to an unacceptable level of risk if additional measures were not applied.

Loading resources